Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dewayne Richardson, Defendant–Appellant.
_
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael R. Sonberg, J.), rendered December 1, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of seven years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly determined that there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, to support the submission of a charge on the justification defense (see People v. Reynoso, 73 N.Y.2d 816 [1988]; People v. Watts, 57 N.Y.2d 299 [1982] ). Defendant was observed repeatedly stomping the victim's head and chest with his heavy boots, while the victim was on the ground covered in blood. Under the circumstances, defendant's boots constituted a dangerous instrument within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00[13]; see People v. Carter, 53 N.Y.2d 113, 116–117 [1981] ), and his conduct, which caused the victim to sustain significant injuries, constituted deadly physical force within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00(11). Moreover, the evidence showed that defendant had an opportunity to safely retreat while the victim was lying on the ground (see People v. Taylor, 92 AD3d 556 [2012]; People v. Mayorquin, 30 AD3d 317 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 850 [2006] ).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 7827
Decided: May 31, 2012
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)