Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Spencer, Defendant–Appellant.
_
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael R. Sonberg, J.), rendered July 26, 2011, resentencing defendant upon his conviction, after a jury trial, of two counts of assault in the second degree, and one count each of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree and promoting prostitution in the fourth degree, to an aggregate term of five years, unanimously affirmed. Appeal from judgment, same court and Justice, rendered May 18, 2010, unanimously dismissed, as superceded by the appeal from the judgment rendered July 26, 2011.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007] ). The testimony of the undercover officer that defendant offered the services of prostitutes established his commission of the crime of promoting prostitution in the fourth degree (see People v. Brown, 74 AD3d 1748 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 802 [2010]; Penal Law § 230.20[1] ). There is no basis to disturb the jury's determination to credit the testimony of the officer.
Moreover, since the officers were performing a lawful duty in arresting defendant, his subsequent actions of violently refusing to be handcuffed or moved from the scene of the incident to the hospital and then to central booking, and causing physical injury to two police officers, established his guilt of assault and obstructing governmental administration.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 7809– 7810
Decided: May 31, 2012
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)