Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Shamona CARLTON, etc., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. ST. BARNABAS HOSPITAL, Defendant–Respondent,
Eric Rothstein, et al., Defendants. St. Barnabas Hospital, Third–Party Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Malsuk Park, M.D., et al., Third–Party Defendants–Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered November 19, 2010, which granted defendant/third-party plaintiff's and third-party defendants' motions for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint and third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Third-party defendants made a prima facie showing—based on hospital records, deposition testimony and the affirmations of experts—that their treatment of plaintiff's late husband comported with good and accepted medical practice. Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the emergency medical physician's opinions were not conclusory (cf. Wasserman v. Carella, 307 A.D.2d 225, 226, 762 N.Y.S.2d 382 [2003] ). In addition, plaintiff failed to preserve her argument that third-party defendants and their experts relied on inadmissible evidence (see Pirraglia v. CCC Realty NY Corp., 35 A.D.3d 234, 235, 828 N.Y.S.2d 6 [2006] ), and we decline to review in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would reject it. Plaintiff does not challenge the accuracy or veracity of the decedent's uncertified medical records or the transcripts of her testimony. In fact, she relied on the medical records in opposition to the motions.
Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact in response to the motions. The affirmation of plaintiff's expert was conclusory, ignored the bulk of the record of the decedent's treatment in the emergency room, and was insufficient to contradict third-party defendants' expert. The defense offered expert testimony that, in light of decedent's symptoms and complaints, he was appropriately diagnosed with lumbosacral sprain/strain and possible radiculopathy, and referred to a neurologist (see Altmann v. Molead, 51 A.D.3d 482, 483, 857 N.Y.S.2d 142 [2008] ). Plaintiff's claim that third-party defendants should have detected decedent's deep vein thrombosis was also conclusory and unsupported by the record (see id.; Wong v. Goldbaum, 23 A.D.3d 277, 279–280, 805 N.Y.S.2d 47 [2005] ).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 26, 2012
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)