Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES VANVALKINBURGH, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for resentencing.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a resentence upon his conviction of three counts of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25[2] ). Defendant's contentions regarding the severity of his resentence are encompassed by the valid waiver of the right to appeal from the resentence (see People v. Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256). Contrary to defendant's contention, the waiver of the right to appeal at the time of the plea is not subject to our review inasmuch as he did not appeal from the judgment, and the resentence occurred more than 30 days after the original sentence (see CPL 450.30[3] ). We nevertheless note, however, that defendant's contention that Supreme Court imposed an aggregate period of 30 years of postrelease supervision is not supported by the record (cf. People v. Kennedy, 78 AD3d 1477, 1479, lv denied 16 NY3d 798). As defendant has failed to recognize, the periods of postrelease supervision imposed on the consecutive terms of imprisonment “shall merge with and be satisfied by discharge of the period of post[ ]release supervision having the longest unexpired time to run” (Penal Law § 70.45[5][c] ).
Although defendant does not challenge the legality of the sentence, the court was required to impose determinate terms of imprisonment in “whole or half years” (Penal Law § 70.80[3] ), and we cannot allow the illegal sentences of 21/313 years of imprisonment imposed on each count to stand (see Kennedy, 78 AD3d at 1479; see generally People v. March, 89 AD3d 1496). We therefore reverse the resentence and remit the matter to Supreme Court for a further resentencing.
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 11–01406
Decided: December 23, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)