LASSEN v. DUNKIN DONUTS INCORPORATED (2011)

Edward LASSEN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. DUNKIN' DONUTS INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Decided: December 20, 2011

GONZALEZ, P.J., MAZZARELLI, ANDRIAS, SWEENY, ROMÁN, JJ.

Law Offices of Joseph B. Strassman, LLP, Huntington (Joseph B. Strassman of counsel), for appellant. Quirk and Bakalor, P.C., New York (Richard H. Bakalor of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered on or about June 28, 2010, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks damages for injuries he sustained when he was struck by a motor vehicle operated by an employee of defendants' franchisees. Plaintiff's theory of the case is vicarious liability based on agency. However, the pleadings allege no facts to substantiate the assertion that the motor vehicle operator was defendants' agent (CPLR 3211[7] ).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network