Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSHUA VELEZ, Defendant–Appellant.
Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Aviva Galpert of counsel), for appellant.
Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Vincent Rivellese of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about July 24, 2020, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent predicate sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant's challenge to risk factor eight, which permits the assessment of points based on an offender's age at the commission of the offender's first sex crime, as violative of his right to due process is unpreserved (see People v. Sincerbeaux, 27 NY3d 683, 689, n 4 [2016] ), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice.
The SORA court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant's request for a downward departure, and defendant has set forth no basis for this Court to exercise its independent discretion to adjudicate defendant a risk level one offender (see People v. Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014] ). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument (see e.g. People v. Lopez, 215 AD3d 575, 575 [1st Dept 2023], lv denied 40 NY3d 904 [2023]; People v. Palmer, 166 AD3d 536, 537 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 919 [2019] ). Even considering defendant's cited mitigation, it was outweighed by the seriousness of the instant offense, where defendant raped a 16–year–old girl just three weeks after he was placed on probation for sexually abusing another 16–year–old girl (see e.g. People v. Rochford, 220 AD3d 546, 546 [1st Dept 2023], lv denied 41 NY3d 905 [2024] ).
Finally, “remand is unnecessary because the record is sufficient for this Court to make its own findings” (People v. Rosario, 227 AD3d 416, 416 [1st Dept 2024], lv denied 42 NY3d 907 [2024] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Ind. No. 3130 /13
Decided: May 14, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)