Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Timothy Reynaldo L. M., A Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Frances M., et al., Respondents–Appellants, The Children's Aid Society, Petitioner–Respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), attorney for the child.
_
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Karen I. Lupuloff, J.), entered on or about May 18, 2009, which, upon a finding that respondent mother suffered from mental illness and that respondent father suffered from mental retardation, terminated respondents' parental rights to the subject child and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding that the mother suffered from mental illness was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Social Services Law § 384–b[4][c], [6] [a] ). The court-appointed psychologist conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the mother and determined that the mother's mental illness, and her reluctance to take medication for her condition, rendered her incapable of caring for the child presently and for the foreseeable future (see Matter of Roberto A. [Altagracia A.], 73 AD3d 501 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 703 [2010]; Matter of Victoria Lauren W., 15 AD3d 165 [2005] ).
Clear and convincing evidence, including the psychologist's testimony, also demonstrated that the father is unable, at present and for the foreseeable future, to provide proper and adequate care for the subject child by reason of his mental retardation, which originated during his developmental period (see Social Services Law § 384–b[4][c], [6][b]; Matter of Jasmine Pauline M., 62 AD3d 483 [2009] ).
We have considered respondents' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 6040– 6041
Decided: November 15, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)