Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JAMES M. STARR, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF STAR LYN STARR, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT, v. ROGER H. HOLES, DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT, JOHN LIVELY AND WENDY LIVELY, DEFENDANTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the complaint against defendant Roger H. Holes is reinstated.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action, individually and on behalf of his daughter, seeking damages for burn injuries sustained by his daughter when she fell into a basin of water. The basin had been placed on a grate covering a floor furnace in an apartment leased to defendants John and Wendy Lively by Roger H. Holes (defendant). Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him. “While an out-of-possession landlord generally will not be responsible for dangerous conditions existing on leased premises, it is settled that [a] landlord may be liable for failing to repair a dangerous condition, of which [he or she] has notice, on leased premises if the landlord assumes a duty to make repairs and reserves the right to enter in order to inspect or to make such repairs” (Oates v. Iacovelli, 80 AD3d 1059, 1060 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). Defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that he lacked control of the premises and thus that he could not be held liable in this case (see Rose v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 298 A.D.2d 834), and his own submissions raise a triable issue of fact whether he had notice of the allegedly dangerous condition (see Finch v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 68 AD3d 1754, 1754–1755). Defendant also failed to establish that section RM1408 of the applicable Residential Code of New York State does not apply to the subject floor furnace (see Brice v. Vermeulen, 74 AD3d 858), or that the alleged violation of that section was not a proximate cause of the injuries sustained by plaintiff's daughter (see Sanchez v. Irun, 83 AD3d 611, 612).
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CA 11–00644
Decided: September 30, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)