PATRICIA IKEDA PLAINTIFF APPELLANT RESPONDENT v. DANIELLE TEDESCO AND JAMES TEDESCO DEFENDANTS RESPONDENTS APPELLANTS (2011)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

PATRICIA IKEDA, PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT–RESPONDENT, v. DANIELLE M. TEDESCO AND JAMES R. TEDESCO, DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS -APPELLANTS.

CA 10–02480

Decided: September 30, 2011

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

RALPH W. FUSCO, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT–RESPONDENT. GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, SYRACUSE (LISA M. ROBINSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS–APPELLANTS.

ORDER

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered March 9, 2010 in a personal injury action. The order granted in part the motion of defendants for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network