Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co., L.P., et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. USA (2011)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co., L.P., et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Marsh USA, Inc., et al., Defendants–Appellants.

4608

Decided: June 28, 2011

Gonzalez, P.J., Catterson, Richter, Abdus–Salaam, Román, JJ.

Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York (Christopher J. St. Jeanos of counsel), for appellants. Anderson Kill & Olick, P.C., New York (Marshall Gilinsky of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered June 29, 2010, modified, on the law, to grant, upon our search of the record, partial summary judgment to plaintiffs to the extent of determining that the tie-in provision was applicable to limit the coverage afforded under the policy, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Opinion by Abdus–Salaam, J. All concur.

Order filed.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network