Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PENELOPE R. COLECHIO–THOMAS, PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT, v. COUNTY OF CATTARAUGUS, DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting that part of the amended motion to compel the deposition of plaintiff's stepfather and as modified the order is affirmed without costs and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action seeking damages for injuries she sustained when she fell in the parking lot of a facility owned and operated by defendant. According to defendant, plaintiff's stepfather is the only witness who observed her fall. In its amended motion seeking, inter alia, to compel the deposition testimony of that witness, defendant sought to depose him at his residence with any accommodations or restrictions deemed by Supreme Court to be appropriate to protect his needs. Although plaintiff provided the affirmation of her stepfather's primary care physician stating that the witness is not physically or psychologically able to “endure” a deposition, we nevertheless agree with defendant that the court abused its discretion in denying its amended motion to compel the deposition of the witness with any necessary restrictions and accommodations because defendant was thereby deprived of discovery of his observations of the incident (cf. Button v. Guererri, 298 A.D.2d 947). Defendant demonstrated that, as the only witness to the incident, the deposition of plaintiff's stepfather is material and necessary to the defense of the action (see CPLR 3101[a]; White v. Tutor Time, 71 AD3d 761, 761–762; cf. Balla v. Jones, 300 A.D.2d 1076). Defendant further demonstrated that the witness is “so sick or infirm as to afford reasonable grounds of belief that he ․ will not be able to attend the trial” and thus that a deposition is necessary to secure his testimony (CPLR 3101[a][3] ). We therefore modify the order by granting that part of the amended motion to compel the deposition of plaintiff's stepfather, and we remit the matter to Supreme Court to determine the location and duration of the deposition and any necessary accommodations or restrictions required to protect his needs.
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CA 11–00203
Decided: June 10, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)