Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Freddy S., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Sharyn Rootenberg of counsel), for presentment agency.
_
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Robert R. Reed, J. at suppression motion; Nancy M. Bannon, J. at disposition), entered on or about February 5, 2010, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon his admission that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute possession of an imitation firearm, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
‘s arrest, based on far more than an anonymous call. The police responded to a radio call stating that shots had just been fired by a described suspect in a park. When the police arrived at the park immediately thereafter, they saw appellant, who met the description. The officers observed that appellant's companions were warning him of the presence of police. At that point, appellant took a series of evasive actions in an obvious effort to hide from the officers, and then fled as the officers approached. The police observations were sufficiently suggestive of the reported criminal activity to provide the requisite corroboration (see People v. Elwell, 50 N.Y.2d 231, 234–235 [1980] ).
The police lawfully searched appellant's backpack as incident to a lawful arrest (see People v. Smith, 59 N.Y.2d 454 [1983]; People v. Wylie, 244 A.D.2d 247 [1997], lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 946 [1998]; compare People v. Gokey, 60 N.Y.2d 309 [1983] ). The arrest and search were contemporaneous, the police had information that appellant had just fired shots, the backpack remained in appellant's grabbable area, the backpack had not been reduced to the exclusive control of the police, and the setting was a crowded park. Under all these circumstances, the police were clearly justified in inspecting the backpack for their own safety and that of the public.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 5197
Decided: May 31, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)