Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eddy MOMPLAISIR, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered October 18, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree, criminal sexual act in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348–349 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations. The victim's testimony was corroborated by her prompt outcry and by physical evidence.
Since defendant objected at trial on different grounds from those raised on appeal (see People v. Graves, 85 N.Y.2d 1024, 1026–1027 [1995] ), he has not preserved his present challenges to expert testimony and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits. The court properly permitted a certified sexual assault nurse to testify as an expert in sexual assault forensics. She testified that the victim's injuries had been recently acquired and that the abrasions on the victim's labia were consistent with forcible penetration. These were matters beyond the knowledge of the average juror, and the witness did not intrude on the jury's fact-finding function (see People v. Harris, 249 A.D.2d 775 [1998] ).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Defendant's pro se claims are unpreserved or unreviewable, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find them without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 03, 2011
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)