Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Eugene L. Jr., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Julianna H., et al., Respondents–Appellants, New York City Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.
Law Offices of Randall S. Carmel, P.C., Syosset (Randall S. Carmel of counsel), attorney for the child.
_
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Monica Drinane, J.), entered on or about March 6, 2009, which, upon a fact-finding that respondents neglected their child, placed the child in petitioner's custody pending the completion of the next scheduled permanency hearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of neglect was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (Family Ct Act § 1046[b][i] ). Undisputed evidence established that police officers, acting under a warrant, recovered a large quantity of cocaine (11/212 ounces), empty ziploc bags and $1,451 from respondents' residence while respondents' three-month-old child was present.
The officer who testified also stated that two undercover buys had taken place in the apartment before the search. Although that testimony is hearsay, neither respondent objected to it and the statement was elicited on cross-examination. In view of this additional testimony, and, drawing the strongest inference the opposing evidence permits against respondents on account of their failure to testify (see Matter of Nassau County Dept. Of Social Servs. v Denise J., 87 N.Y.2d 73, 79 [1995] ), we conclude that either both respondents engaged in the sale of cocaine in the apartment or one of them did with the knowledge of the other. Thus, the evidence demonstrates such an impaired level of parental judgment as to permit the requisite finding of an imminent danger to the three-month-old child's physical, mental or emotional condition (see Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i]; Matter of Andrew DeJ. R., 30 AD3d 238 [2006]; Matter of Michael R., 309 A.D.2d 590 [2003] ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2803– 2804
Decided: April 14, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)