Helen Bubul, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Port Parties, Ltd., Defendant–Appellant, The Unconvention Center, et al., Defendants. (2011)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Helen Bubul, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Port Parties, Ltd., Defendant–Appellant, The Unconvention Center, et al., Defendants.

4805

Decided: April 14, 2011

Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Catterson, Abdus–Salaam, Manzanet–Daniels, JJ.

Quinn McCabe LLP, New York (Todd J. DeSimone of counsel), for appellant. The Ruth E. Bernstein Law Firm, New York (Ruth E. Bernstein of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sue Anne Hoahng, Special Referee), entered September 13, 2010, which determined that plaintiff obtained personal jurisdiction over defendant-appellant, and denied appellant's order to show cause to vacate the default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Special Referee's findings that appellant was properly served in this action are substantially supported by the record, and we perceive no basis for disturbing the Referee's credibility determinations (Thomas v. Thomas, 21 AD3d 949 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 704 [2006]; Namer v 152–54–56 W. 15th St. Realty Corp., 108 A.D.2d 705 [1985] ). We have considered the remainder of appellant's arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

CLERK

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network