Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jasmine Courtney C., and Another Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Sonia J., Respondent–Appellant,
Saint Dominic's Home,
Petitioner–Respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Patricia Colella of counsel), attorney for the children.
_
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Douglas Hoffman, J.), entered on or about December 1, 2009, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights to the subject children and committed the custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Family Court's determination that the mother permanently neglected the children was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The record establishes that the agency exercised diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the mother's relationship with the children (see Social Services Law § 384–b[7][a] ). Those efforts included meeting with the mother to review her service plan and discuss the importance of compliance, scheduling visitation, and changing the visitation date and time to accommodate the mother (see Matter of Aisha C., 58 AD3d 471, 471–472 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 706 [2009] ). Notwithstanding the agency's diligent efforts, the mother failed “substantially and continuously or repeatedly to maintain contact with or plan for the future of the” children (§ 384–b[7][a] ). During the relevant time period, the mother attended only 5 of the 52 scheduled visitations. The mother's failure to maintain contact with the children through consistent visitation constitutes permanent neglect (see Aisha C., 58 AD3d at 472).
Given that it was undisputed that the mother had been abused by the children's father, the court properly deemed irrelevant the details of a single altercation and the contents of a letter regarding same.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 4732– 4732A
Decided: April 07, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)