Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York Ex. Rel Dominic Larocco, Petitioner, v. Warden, etc., et al., Respondents.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (David Lawrence III of counsel), for New York State Division of Parole, respondent.
_
Determination of respondent State Division of Parole, dated February 13, 2009, which revoked petitioner's parole and imposed a 24-month time assessment, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, Bronx County [Robert A. Neary, J.], entered on or about May 10, 2010), dismissed, without costs.
The determination that petitioner violated his parole by stalking and harassing the 17-year-old victim was supported by substantial evidence (see generally People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139 [1985] ). The hearing testimony established that the victim was frightened, annoyed and alarmed by petitioner's repeated conduct over a period of months, and petitioner's intent could be inferred from the surrounding circumstances (see Matter of Reiss v. Reiss, 221 A.D.2d 280 [1995], lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 801 [1996] ). Respondent's decision to impose a 24-month time assessment rather than accept the administrative law judge's (ALJ) recommendation of an 18-month assessment was a provident exercise of discretion. The recommendation of the ALJ is advisory and not binding on respondent (see People ex rel. Coleman v. Smith, 75 A.D.2d 706, 707 [1980], lv denied 50 N.Y.2d 804 [1980] ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 4623
Decided: March 24, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)