Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
William Lugo, Plaintiff, 84169/08 v.
Purple & White Markets, Inc., etc., Defendant, White Rose, Inc., et al., Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FICA Transportation, Inc., Third-Party- Defendant-Respondent.
_
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered on or about August 24, 2009, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants-third-party plaintiffs' (collectively, White Rose) motion for a default judgment against third-party-defendant FICA Transportation, Inc. (FICA) and granted FICA's cross motion to dismiss the third-party complaint to the extent of dismissing White Rose Food's claim for breach of contract, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court properly denied White Rose's motion for a default judgment against FICA and compelled acceptance of FICA's answer. White Rose's attempt to serve FICA pursuant to CPLR 3215(g)(4)(i) was plainly inadequate, as it was not sent to FICA's last known address.
The motion court also properly dismissed the breach of contract cause of action, brought by White Rose Foods, Inc., for FICA's failure to obtain insurance coverage. The 2001 agreement, which provided the only basis for a relationship between White Rose Foods and FICA, contained an express provision barring any civil actions brought more than two years after the occurrence giving rise to the claim. Here, the evidence of insurance coverage was to have been provided to White Rose Foods on or about December 19, 2001, making December 2003 the latest this claim for breach could have been brought. Thus, the breach of contract claim is untimely.
We have considered White Rose's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 4411
Decided: March 15, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)