IN RE: Dominick COGNATA (2011)

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered December 22, 2009, which denied the petition seeking to annul respondent's denial of petitioner's appeal from a housing company's rejection of his application for succession rights to an apartment, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner did not have the right to succeed to the subject apartment since he could not make the necessary demonstration that the unit was his primary residence for the required time period (see Matter of Greichel v. New York State Div. of Hous. and Community Renewal, 39 AD3d 421 [2007] ). Although petitioner presented evidence of having resided in the apartment, he did not submit evidence in proper form, such as a notice of change or income affidavits, showing that he resided there in the two years preceding the tenant of record's death (see Matter of Martino v. Southbridge Towers, Inc., 68 AD3d 412 [2009] ).

We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions, including that respondent acted arbitrarily and capriciously in failing to adhere to precedent, and find them unavailing.