Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mohan KOWLESSAR, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Carter, J.), rendered March 19, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of four counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's arguments concerning the People's summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits. The prosecutor had a sufficient basis on which to comment on defendant's failure to call his brother to corroborate his own testimony, and this comment did not improperly shift the burden of proof. Defendant's brother was an available and presumably favorable witness who could have provided material, noncumulative testimony (see People v. Cochran, 29 AD3d 365 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 787 [2006] ). The remaining summation remarks challenged on appeal were permissible comments on the evidence and responses to the defendant's summation (see People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133 [1997], lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 976 [1992]; People v. D'Alessandro, 184 A.D.2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 884 [1993] ).
Defendant did not preserve his challenge to the proficiency of the official court interpreter at trial who translated the victim's testimony, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find the record establishes that the interpreter provided an adequate translation of the testimony. While there were occasional difficulties in translation, they were sufficiently rectified so that the victim's testimony was properly presented to the jury (see e.g. People v. Watkins, 12 AD3d 165 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 836 [2005]; People v. Nedal, 198 A.D.2d 42 [1993] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 01, 2011
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)