Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. BOBBY L. LILLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal contempt in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.50[3] ), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal was invalid and that County Court impermissibly enhanced his sentence by issuing a stay away order of protection in favor of the victim (see generally CPL 530.13[4] ). We note at the outset that it is of no moment whether defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid. Such a waiver, even if valid, would not preclude our consideration of defendant's contention concerning the order of protection, because such an order was not a part of the plea agreement, nor was such an order discussed during the plea colloquy (see generally People v. Doris, 64 AD3d 813, lv denied 13 NY3d 796). Nevertheless, we conclude that defendant's contention with respect to the order of protection is without merit. “An order of protection may properly be issued independent of a plea agreement” (People v. Smith, 294 A.D.2d 916, 916) and, although such an order is issued at sentencing, it is not a part of defendant's sentence (see People v. Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 316; People v. Dixon, 16 AD3d 517). Contrary to defendant's further contention, the court had the authority to issue the order of protection in the absence of the victim's consent (see People v. Monacelli, 299 A.D.2d 916, lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 617).
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 09-02161
Decided: February 18, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)