Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Priscilla Quinones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. New England Motor Freight Inc., et al, Defendants-Respondents.
_
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered March 10, 2010, which granted defendants Pease and New England Motor Freight Inc.'s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to them, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about March 25, 2010, which granted plaintiff's motion for reargument, and upon reargument, adhered to its original determination, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff alleged she sustained personal injuries when her car struck a disabled vehicle after she was abruptly cut off by defendants' tractor trailer on the highway.
Defendants met their burden of establishing prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by presenting evidence that defendants Pease and New England Motor Freight did not cause the accident. The burden then shifted to plaintiff, who failed to raise a triable issue of fact to defeat summary judgment (see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562 [1980]; Silverman v. Perlbinder, 307 A.D.2d 230, 231 [2003] ) with her submission of a police accident report. The court properly disregarded the accident report, made by a police officer who was not an eyewitness, that contained several obvious inaccuracies and the hearsay statements of a defendant regarding the ultimate issues of fact (Figueroa v. Luna, 281 A.D.2d 204, 205 [2001] ).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them without merit.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
_
CLERK
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 4084- 4084A
Decided: January 20, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)