Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. DAVID PLUNKETT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC., NEW YORK CITY (BEBE J. ANDERSON OF COUNSEL), FOR AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HIV MEDICINE ASSOCIATION OF NURSES IN AIDS CARE, HIV MEDICINE ASSOCIATION, AND LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC., AMICI CURIAE.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of one count of aggravated assault upon a police officer or a peace officer (Penal Law § 120.11) and two counts of assault in the second degree (§ 120.05[3] ). By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his contention that County Court erred in refusing to dismiss the indictment based upon the prosecutor's alleged failure to introduce exculpatory evidence before the grand jury (see People v. Crumpler, 70 AD3d 1396, 1397, lv denied 14 NY3d 839), as well as his contention concerning the alleged insufficiency of the evidence presented to the grand jury (see People v. Dickerson, 66 AD3d 1371, 1372-1373, lv denied 13 NY3d 859). In addition, defendant forfeited his contention that the court improperly curtailed defense counsel's questioning of prospective jurors concerning their views on mental illness because, “[b]y pleading guilty instead of going to trial, the defendant ․ necessarily surrendered his right to challenge on appeal any alleged trial errors” (People v. Green, 75 N.Y.2d 902, 904-905, cert denied 498 U.S. 860).
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: KA 09-01437
Decided: October 01, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)