Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JOHN J. BIRD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. VICKIE L. BIRD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted in part and the default judgment of divorce is vacated.
Memorandum: Defendant, as limited by her brief on appeal, contends that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying that part of her motion seeking to vacate the default judgment of divorce. We agree. “Although a party seeking to vacate a default judgment must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense, ‘[o]ur courts have embraced a liberal policy with respect to vacating default judgments in matrimonial actions' “ (Dunbar v. Dunbar, 233 A.D.2d 922, 922; see De Pass v. De Pass, 42 AD3d 723, 724). In support of her motion, defendant submitted evidence that she was not represented by counsel and that plaintiff misled her with respect to his intention to pursue the divorce action (see generally D'Alleva v. D'Alleva, 127 A.D.2d 732, 735). In addition, defendant established a meritorious claim to her distributive share of the marital property from the marriage of nearly 20 years' duration (see Viner v. Viner, 291 A.D.2d 398). We thus conclude, particularly in light of the public policy favoring the disposition of matrimonial actions on the merits, that the court erred in denying defendant's motion insofar as it sought vacatur of the default judgment of divorce (see id. at 399; see also Dunbar, 233 A.D.2d 922).
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CA 09-01404
Decided: October 01, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)