Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: IRIS R., Petitioner-Respondent, v. JOSE R., Respondent, Lisa R., Respondent-Appellant.
Order, Family Court, New York County (Sarah P. Cooper, Referee), entered on or about November 8, 2007, which, after a hearing and to the extent appealed from, granted the paternal grandmother's petition for modification of a 2005 order that had given her physical custody of the child in a joint custody arrangement with respondent parents, and denied respondent mother's cross petition for sole custody, awarding sole custody to petitioner with permission to relocate with the child to Florida, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The 2005 custody arrangement was granted on consent, and respondent mother failed to demonstrate a sufficient change in circumstances since the time of that stipulation to support her latest cross petition (see Sergei P. v. Sofia M., 44 AD3d 490 [2007] ). Additionally, extraordinary circumstances triggered this latest inquiry as to the best interests of the child with regard to changing petitioner's physical custody to sole custody (see Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 544 [1976] ). The evidence established persistent neglect by both parents, and revealed a prolonged separation between them and the child, who has been residing with petitioner for over three years (Domestic Relations Law § 72[2][b]; see Matter of Carton v. Grimm, 51 AD3d 1111, 1112 n [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 716 [2008] ).
Based upon the totality of the circumstances, including evidence relating to the parents' past performance and the need to maintain stability for this young child (now nine years old), we find no basis for disturbing the court's best-interests award of sole custody to petitioner, with permission for the child to remain with her in Florida (see Matter of Elizabeth A., 13 AD3d 615 [2004] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 03, 2010
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)