Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth CAMERON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered July 9, 2007, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and bail jumping in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find defendant's claim to be without merit. The court accurately stated the law when, in response to a question from defendant at the plea proceeding, it told him he could raise an issue of grand jury perjury on appeal (see People v. Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d 97, 476 N.Y.S.2d 79, 464 N.E.2d 447 [1984] ). It is of no moment that, as defendant now concedes, such an argument would have been baseless, since the court made no representations as to the viability of such claim.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Although the lineup photograph was lost, the People established the lineup's fairness (see People v. Chipp, 75 N.Y.2d 327, 336, 553 N.Y.S.2d 72, 552 N.E.2d 608 [1990], cert. denied 498 U.S. 833, 111 S.Ct. 99, 112 L.Ed.2d 70 [1990] ) through the sufficiently detailed testimony of the arresting officer and complainant. It is also significant that at the lineup defendant was represented by counsel, who only noted a height difference among the participants that was minimized by having them seated.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 18, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)