Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Pierre JONES, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05[2] ). Contrary to the contentions of defendant, we conclude that his waiver of the right to appeal is valid (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145), and that it is not void as against public policy (see People v. Muniz, 91 N.Y.2d 570, 573-575, 673 N.Y.S.2d 358, 696 N.E.2d 182; People v. Kapp, 59 A.D.3d 974, 974-975, 872 N.Y.S.2d 331, lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 818, 881 N.Y.S.2d 25, 908 N.E.2d 933). The challenge by defendant to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution is encompassed by his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Grimes, 53 A.D.3d 1055, 1056, 860 N.Y.S.2d 723, lv. denied 11 N.Y.3d 789, 866 N.Y.S.2d 615, 896 N.E.2d 101) and, in any event, that challenge is unpreserved for our review because defendant did not move to withdraw the plea on that ground (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5). In support of his motion to withdraw his plea at the time of sentencing, defendant contended that his plea was involuntary because it was coerced by County Court and he felt pressured into entering a plea. That contention, however, is belied by the record of the plea proceeding, and we thus reject the contention of defendant that the court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his plea. The fact that the court reminded defendant that the jury was waiting downstairs during the plea proceeding does not constitute coercion, nor does it render the plea involuntary (see Grimes, 53 A.D.3d at 1056, 860 N.Y.S.2d 723). Indeed, in support of his motion, defendant presented no evidence of innocence, fraud, or mistake in the inducement of the plea (see People v. Thomas, 17 A.D.3d 1047, 793 N.Y.S.2d 652, lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 770, 801 N.Y.S.2d 264, 834 N.E.2d 1274). The statement of defendant that he was “under a lot of stress” at the time of the plea does not, by itself, warrant granting his motion to withdraw the plea (see People v. Robinson, 301 A.D.2d 745, 746-747, 753 N.Y.S.2d 239, lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 542, 763 N.Y.S.2d 8, 793 N.E.2d 422; People v. Merck, 242 A.D.2d 792, 793, 661 N.Y.S.2d 881, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 895, 669 N.Y.S.2d 9, 691 N.E.2d 1035).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 26, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)