Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. CHAZARAY A. GREEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by directing that the sentence imposed for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree shall run concurrently with the sentence imposed for manslaughter in the second degree and as modified the judgment is affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.15[1] ), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (§ 265.03[1][b] ) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02 [former (4) ] ). We agree with defendant that the sentence imposed for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree must run concurrently with the sentence imposed for manslaughter in the second degree, and we therefore modify the judgment accordingly. “Given the element of intent to use the weapon unlawfully against another and the lack of any evidence that defendant intended to use his weapon unlawfully against another apart from its use in the shooting, the crimes of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and [manslaughter] must be regarded as a ‘single act or omission’ “ (People v. Manor, 38 AD3d 1257, 1259, lv denied 9 NY3d 847, quoting § 70.25[2]; see People v. Hamilton, 4 NY3d 654, 657-658). The record belies defendant's further contention that County Court failed to consider rehabilitation in determining the appropriate sentence to impose. Indeed, the record establishes that the court considered rehabilitation in “perform[ing] the delicate balancing necessary to accommodate the public and private interests represented in the criminal process” in sentencing a defendant (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 306). The record also fails to support defendant's contention that, in sentencing defendant, the court considered crimes of which defendant was acquitted (see People v. Ealey, 272 A.D.2d 269, 270, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 865).
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: KA 07-01136
Decided: April 30, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)