Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MICHELLE EDGETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF KIYA EDGETT, AN INFANT, AND CHRISTINA JAQUAY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. NORTH FORK BANK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
NORTH FORK BANK, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KAREN CLARELLI, DOING BUSINESS AS KC RECOVERY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND NORTHWAY EXCHANGE AUTO AUCTION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident, third-party defendant Northway Exchange Auto Auction (Northway) appeals from an order that, inter alia, denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third amended third-party complaint against it. Supreme Court properly denied the motion, regardless of its merits, inasmuch as Northway failed to provide in support of its motion a copy of all of the third-party pleadings (see CPLR 3212[b]; D.J. Enters. of WNY v. Benderson, 294 A.D.2d 825).
We note in addition that, although defendant North Fork Bank (North Fork) purports to cross-appeal from those parts of the order denying its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the fourth amended complaint against it and for summary judgment on the third amended third-party complaint against Northway, that cross appeal was deemed dismissed nine months after the service of the notice of appeal based on North Fork's failure to perfect it (see 22 NYCRR 1000.12[b] ). North Fork has not moved to vacate that dismissal (see 22 NYCRR 1000.13[g] ), and thus its requests for affirmative relief are not before us.
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: CA 09-02526
Decided: April 30, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)