Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES A. PARKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by directing that the sentence imposed for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree shall run concurrently with the sentence imposed for assault in the first degree and as modified the judgment is affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10[1] ) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (§ 265.03[1][b] ). We agree with defendant that the sentence imposed for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree must run concurrently with the sentence imposed for assault in the first degree, and we therefore modify the judgment accordingly. “[T]here was no evidence of intent to intimidate the victim[s] separate from the intent to shoot [them]” (People v. Miles, 288 A.D.2d 877, 877, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 758; see People v. Holland, 13 AD3d 1101, lv denied 4 NY3d 853). Thus, “ ‘the weapon possession was not separate and distinct from the shooting[ ]’ and consecutive sentences ․ are prohibited” (People v. Mercer, 66 AD3d 1368, 1370, lv denied 13 NY3d 940).
Defendant further contends that his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree must be reversed because he may have been convicted of an unindicted offense (see generally People v. Benet, 45 AD3d 1449, 1450, lv denied 10 NY3d 761; People v. Watkins, 300 A.D.2d 1070, 1070-1071, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 659). We reject that contention. The People “presented evidence of one continuing act of possession rather than two separate acts of possession” (Benet, 45 AD3d at 1450). We note in addition that, during summation, the prosecutor “obviated any potential for juror confusion with respect to the possibility of two separate acts of possession” by specifying the moment when defendant committed the offense of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (id.).
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: KA 08-00305
Decided: April 30, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)