Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Regina D. BEAZER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Fraser M. WEBSTER, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered December 3, 2008, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden of establishing that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102(d). Defendants' experts did not address or attempt to distinguish the objective findings of plaintiff's MRI, the EMG/NCV scan, and the other evidence of serious injury (see Patterson v. Rivera, 49 AD3d 337 [2008] ). Defendants' failure to indicate the objective tests used to determine the range of motion in plaintiff's cervical spine was fatal to their efforts to establish a prima facie case for summary dismissal (Offman v. Singh, 27 AD3d 284 [2006] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 25, 2010
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)