Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
853 SEVENTH AVENUE OWNERS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W & HM REALTY CO., LLC etc., Defendant-Respondent.
W & HM Realty Co., LLC, Petitioner-Respondent, v. 853 Seventh Avenue Owners, LLC, Respondent-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered June 8, 2009, which denied plaintiff 853's motion to modify a prior order declaring that the impact of the rent stabilization and rent control laws should not be considered in appraising land defendant W & HM leased to 853, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order (same court and Justice), entered June 11, 2009, which, in a related special proceeding, granted W & HM's petition to confirm an appraisal award, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order (same court, Justice and entry date), which denied 853's cross petition to vacate that award, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
This Court has previously rejected 853's claim that in determining the value of-and, in turn, the rent for-property it leases from W & HM, the appraisers should consider the impact of the rent control and rent stabilization laws (18 A.D.3d 241, 794 N.Y.S.2d 373). Our finding there was based on the clear language in the lease before us that “[t]he net annual rent during each renewal term shall be an amount equal to 6% of the appraised value of the land ․ exclusive of any buildings or improvements thereon and this Lease.” The opinion of the Court of Appeals in 936 Second Ave. L.P. v. Second Corporate Dev. Co., Inc., 10 N.Y.3d 628, 861 N.Y.S.2d 256, 891 N.E.2d 289 [2008] does not constitute a change in the law and does not warrant a modification of our prior ruling. In that case, where the determination of rent for the net lease was to be based on “the value of the demised premises together with all buildings and improvements thereon including any and all additions and improvements erected by Tenant” (id. at 631-632, 861 N.Y.S.2d 256, 891 N.E.2d 289), the Court found that the net lease itself was to be taken into account in determining the rent. Since the wording of the lease here at issue specifically excludes buildings or improvements, as well as the lease itself, from the determination of value, the finding in 936 Second Ave. is of no effect (see New York Overnight Partners v. Gordon, 88 N.Y.2d 716, 649 N.Y.S.2d 928, 673 N.E.2d 123 [1996] ).
We have considered 853's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 18, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)