Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
546-552 WEST 146TH STREET LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, Harlem I LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Rachel L. ARFA, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Gadi Zamir, et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered on or about June 8, 2009, which denied defendants-appellants' motion for indemnification of legal expenses incurred in this action, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion granted, and the matter remanded for calculation of such expenses.
This Court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint in this action based on plaintiff limited liability companies' lack of standing (54 A.D.3d 543, 863 N.Y.S.2d 412 [2008], lv. dismissed in part, denied in part 12 N.Y.3d 840, 881 N.Y.S.2d 13, 908 N.E.2d 921 [2009] ). That claims for the same alleged wrongdoing remain pending in a parallel action brought by the investors does not impair defendants' entitlement to the indemnification they seek. We interpret the indemnification provision (§ 6.8) in the LLC operating agreements, that substantially tracks the statute authorizing payment of expenses to managers regarding “any and all claims and demands whatsoever” (Limited Liability Company Law § 420), to require indemnification upon the resolution of the action or proceeding for which indemnification is sought. To make defendants wait until all of the related claims against them are resolved would eviscerate the right to indemnification (see generally Stockman v. Heartland Indus. Partners, L.P., 2009 WL 2096213, *11, 2009 Del. Ch. LEXIS 131, *42-46 [Del. Ch. 2009] ). The award of indemnification need not await a finding that defendants were free of misconduct. The cases plaintiffs rely upon for that proposition merely happen to involve trials in which there was evidence of wrongdoing (cf. Diamond v. Diamond, 307 N.Y. 263, 120 N.E.2d 819 [1954]; People v. Uran Min. Corp., 13 A.D.2d 419, 216 N.Y.S.2d 985 [1961] ).
Upon remand, there is no need to allocate the expenses because the amount of legal services did not depend on the different capacities of the various defendants, but on plaintiffs' status. We decline to address whether the indemnified legal expenses should include those incurred in filing the motion for indemnification or in prosecuting this appeal, because the issue was not fully briefed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 18, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)