Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Catherine CHOMIK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jaroslaw SYPNIAK, Respondent-Respondent.
Petitioner mother appeals from an order of Family Court denying her objections to the Support Magistrate's order, which in turn denied her motion to vacate the parties' prior consent order.
By order entered July 24, 2006, Family Court, upon the parties' consent, entered a judgment in favor of respondent father in the amount of $14,000 in child support arrears. In May 2008, the mother commenced this proceeding seeking to vacate that order on the ground that, during the time period in which the arrears accrued, she was receiving public assistance and, thus, pursuant to Family Court Act § 413(1)(g), arrears could not accrue in excess of $500.
Although an order entered upon consent generally “is not subject to the review of either Family Court or this Court” (Matter of Steuben County Support Collection Unit v. Bartholomew, 2 A.D.3d 1434, 1435, 768 N.Y.S.2d 908, lv. denied 2 N.Y.3d 702, 703, 778 N.Y.S.2d 460, 461, 810 N.E.2d 913; see Matter of Culton v. Culton, 2 A.D.3d 1446, 769 N.Y.S.2d 431), it is well settled that “a court maintains inherent power to vacate a judgment [or order] in the interest of justice[, and that t]he enumerated grounds in CPLR 5015 are neither preemptive nor exhaustive and were not intended to limit that power” (Ruben v. American & Foreign Ins. Co., 185 A.D.2d 63, 67, 592 N.Y.S.2d 167). Thus, an order entered on consent may indeed be subject to vacatur under CPLR 5015 (see Matter of Croft v. Gordon, 297 A.D.2d 344, 746 N.Y.S.2d 397; 390 W. End Assoc. v. Baron, 274 A.D.2d 330, 332, 711 N.Y.S.2d 176).
Here, we conclude that Family Court erred in failing to determine whether the mother's income was “less than or equal to the poverty income guidelines amount for a single person as reported by the federal department of health and human services” when the $14,000 in child support arrears accrued (Family Ct. Act § 413[1][g] ). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to Family Court to make that determination (see Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of Rensselaer County v. Faresta, 11 A.D.3d 750, 783 N.Y.S.2d 420). In the event that the mother's income was less than that amount, “unpaid child support arrears in excess of five hundred dollars shall not accrue” (§ 413[1][g]; see Matter of Blake v. Syck, 230 A.D.2d 596, 599, 661 N.Y.S.2d 341, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 811, 666 N.Y.S.2d 99, 688 N.E.2d 1381).
It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved, and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 11, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)