Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JAZMYN R., and Another, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Luceita F., Respondent-Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about February 3, 2009, which released the children to the custody of respondent mother without supervision, following a fact-finding determination on June 19, 2008, that the mother had neglected her daughter Kieasha by inflicting excessive corporal punishment and derivatively neglected her daughter Jazmyn, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (Family Ct. Act § 1046[b][i] ) showing that respondent inflicted excessive corporal punishment (Family Ct. Act § 1012[f][i][B] ), by beating her daughter Kieasha with two intertwined belts that left a buckle-shaped bruise and puncture marks on her arm (see e.g. Matter of Fred Darryl B., 41 A.D.3d 276, 836 N.Y.S.2d 878 [2007]; Matter of Maria Raquel L., 36 A.D.3d 425, 826 N.Y.S.2d 252 [2007] ). The out-of-court testimony of the child to the police detective was corroborated by the detective's observation of the bruise and puncture wounds (see Matter of Nicole V., 71 N.Y.2d 112, 118, 524 N.Y.S.2d 19, 518 N.E.2d 914 [1987] ).
The mother's failure to testify at the fact-finding hearing permitted the court to draw the strongest inference against her (see Matter of Dante M., 87 N.Y.2d 73, 79, 637 N.Y.S.2d 666, 661 N.E.2d 138 [1995]; Matter of Maria Raquel L. at 425, 826 N.Y.S.2d 252).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 12, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)