Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BROOKLYN COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT LLC, et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., Respondents-Respondents.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered September 29, 2008, denying the petition seeking, inter alia, to annul respondents' determination disqualifying petitioner Brooklyn Community Management LLC (BCM), its affiliates and all principal owners or officers from conducting business with respondent Department of Education (DOE), and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
DOE's determination was rationally based upon BCM's continued refusal to accept responsibility for its failure to comply with a certain student's Individualized Education Plan and for having submitted false billing forms pertaining to that student. BCM also failed to answer accurately all questions on the VENDEX forms it submitted as part of its bid proposal for a new contract with DOE, and there were outstanding tax liens against another entity identified as owned by BCM's owner (see e.g. Matter of Ciprietti-Tolisano Assoc. v. Karnovsky, 268 A.D.2d 234, 700 N.Y.S.2d 473 [2000], lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 759, 714 N.Y.S.2d 709, 737 N.E.2d 951 [2000] ).
The penalty imposed is not shocking to one's sense of fairness (see Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, 38, 724 N.Y.S.2d 680, 747 N.E.2d 1280 [2001] ), and contrary to petitioners' contention, was not based upon a single billing error.
We have considered petitioners' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 05, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)