Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Abdulla AHMED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.D. KOBSONS, INC., Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered on or about May 5, 2009, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that he would probably succeed on the merits and that the equities weighed in his favor (see Nobu Next Door, LLC v. Fine Arts Hous., Inc., 4 N.Y.3d 839, 840, 800 N.Y.S.2d 48, 833 N.E.2d 191 [2005] ). The subject lease afforded plaintiff a renewal option, provided that he was not delinquent in the payment of rent and was not in material default under any other provision of the lease (see Jefpaul Garage Corp. v. Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y., 61 N.Y.2d 442, 448, 474 N.Y.S.2d 458, 462 N.E.2d 1176 [1984] ). Plaintiff was not only continuously late with the payment of rent but was also delinquent in the payment of water charges, sign fees and sanitation charges, thereby materially defaulting under other provisions of the lease.
The “no waiver” clause of the lease, which provides, in pertinent part, that defendant's acceptance of rent shall not be deemed a waiver of any breach by plaintiff, vitiates plaintiff's argument that defendant must renew the lease based on an established course of dealing. Nor, contrary to his contention, does the lease require defendant to serve a notice to cure a rent delinquency or other material default that would preclude renewal.
Plaintiff's remaining arguments are unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 10, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)