Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: KAYLA EMILY W., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Atara W., Respondent-Appellant, Catholic Guardian Society and Home Bureau, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sara P. Schechter, J.), entered on or about March 14, 2008, which terminated respondent's parental rights and awarded custody and guardianship of the child to the Commissioner of Social Services and petitioner child care agency for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order of fact-finding (same court and Judge), entered on or about February 5, 2008, which, upon respondent's default, determined that she had permanently neglected her daughter, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.
Respondent's argument, that the petition did not adequately specify the agency's diligent efforts, is unpreserved, as she did not raise this argument below (see Matter of Toshea C.J., 62 A.D.3d 587, 880 N.Y.S.2d 36 [2009]; Matter of Kimberly Vanessa J., 37 A.D.3d 185, 185, 829 N.Y.S.2d 473 [2007] ). In any event, we find the petition sufficient and that any alleged deficiency was cured by the introduction into evidence at the fact-finding hearing of the agency's case progress notes, which provided detail into the agency's efforts to reunite the child with respondent (see Matter of Gina Rachel L., 44 A.D.3d 367, 368, 843 N.Y.S.2d 50 [2007]; Kimberly Vanessa J., 37 A.D.3d at 185, 829 N.Y.S.2d 473). The case notes likewise support Family Court's finding that respondent failed to plan for her daughter's future, in that she failed to utilize rehabilitative services and material resources made available to her (see Social Services Law § 384-b[7] [c]; Matter of Justina Rose D., 28 A.D.3d 659, 660, 813 N.Y.S.2d 229 [2006]; Matter of Tanya Alexis G., 273 A.D.2d 19, 19, 708 N.Y.S.2d 394 [2000] ). Family Court's finding that adoption was in the child's best interest is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Elizabeth Amanda T., 44 A.D.3d 507, 508, 843 N.Y.S.2d 325 [2007] ).
The appeal from the fact-finding order must be dismissed as no appeal lies from an order entered on default (see Matter of Kawari Claude C., 248 A.D.2d 158, 158, 669 N.Y.S.2d 566 [1998] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 10, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)