QRT ASSOCIATES INC v. United Equities Company, Defendant-Respondent. (2007)

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered October 26, 2006, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs' application to vacate their default on defendant United Equities' motion for summary judgment, and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

 A default may not be vacated without demonstrating a reasonable excuse for the failure to respond and a meritorious cause of action (see Kalisch v. Maple Trade Fin. Corp., 35 A.D.3d 291, 827 N.Y.S.2d 40 [2006] ).   Even assuming that plaintiffs had a reasonable excuse for their default, they did not present an affidavit of merit or otherwise demonstrate any merit to their claims.   United's relatively brief delay in submitting the order for settlement was excusable under the circumstances.   Permitting plaintiffs to proceed with their action would have been “an exercise in futility” (Russell Kikenborg v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 291 A.D.2d 281, 738 N.Y.S.2d 37 [2002], lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 608, 746 N.Y.S.2d 692, 774 N.E.2d 757 [2002], cert. denied 537 U.S. 1089, 123 S.Ct. 703, 154 L.Ed.2d 633 [2002] ).