Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: STEPHON ELIJAH G., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Stephanie G., Respondent-Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P. Roberts, J.), entered on or about March 12, 2008, placing the subject child, until completion of the next permanency hearing, with petitioner upon a fact-finding determination of neglect, unanimously affirmed insofar as it brings up for review the fact-finding determination, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed as moot, without costs. Appeal from fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about March 12, 2008, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the order of disposition.
The placement has been rendered moot by the expiration of the dispositional order from which respondent appeals (Matter of Taisha R., 14 A.D.3d 410, 788 N.Y.S.2d 357 [2005] ). The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence showing, inter alia, that respondent has a history of unresolved psychiatric and drug-related problems; failed to comply with a 2005 neglect order, issued in a proceeding involving another child who was ultimately adopted, directing her to seek treatment for such conditions; used marijuana while pregnant with the subject child; and was too confused at times to address her own needs (Family Ct. Act § 1012 [f][i]; see Matter of Jesse DD., 223 A.D.2d 929, 636 N.Y.S.2d 925 [1996], lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 803, 645 N.Y.S.2d 445, 668 N.E.2d 416 [1996], citing, inter alia, Matter of Madeline R., 214 A.D.2d 445, 625 N.Y.S.2d 512 [1995] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 30, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)