Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James D. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.06[2] ), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in refusing to suppress the marihuana and cocaine found when his parole officer searched the vehicle that defendant had driven to his appointment with the parole officer. We reject that contention. The record establishes that defendant previously had failed drug tests and also had failed the drug test given on the day in question. In addition, defendant had an inexplicably large amount of cash on his person that day. We thus conclude that “the conduct of the parole officer was rationally and reasonably related to the performance of the parole officer's duty” (People v. Huntley, 43 N.Y.2d 175, 181, 401 N.Y.S.2d 31, 371 N.E.2d 794; see People v. Lopez, 288 A.D.2d 70, 733 N.Y.S.2d 154, lv. denied 97 N.Y.2d 706, 739 N.Y.S.2d 107, 765 N.E.2d 310). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5; People v. Brown, 305 A.D.2d 1068-1069, 759 N.Y.S.2d 830, lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 579, 764 N.Y.S.2d 389, 796 N.E.2d 481). “In any event, ‘[a] bargained guilty plea to a lesser crime makes unnecessary a factual basis for the particular crime confessed’ ” (People v. Turner, 16 A.D.3d 1150, 790 N.Y.S.2d 916, lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 770, 801 N.Y.S.2d 265, 834 N.E.2d 1275, quoting People v. Clairborne, 29 N.Y.2d 950, 951, 329 N.Y.S.2d 580, 280 N.E.2d 366). Finally, the fact that the court did not inform defendant that he may be subject to predicate felon treatment in the future did not render the plea involuntary or unknowing (see People v. Folk, 43 A.D.3d 1229, 1230, 842 N.Y.S.2d 108; People v. August, 33 A.D.3d 1046, 1050, 822 N.Y.S.2d 334, lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 878, 832 N.Y.S.2d 490, 864 N.E.2d 620).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 14, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)