Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Londel STEELE, also known as Hassan Steele, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Anne Williams, J. at suppression hearing; Daniel P. FitzGerald, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered April 16, 1996, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 1/212 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The police had, at least, reasonable suspicion for defendant's initial detention, since the victim's account of a criminal incident contained sufficient indicia of defendant's accessorial liability. Moreover, defendant put his hands up before the officer said anything. These circumstances, coupled with the discovery of a discarded pistol in defendant's close proximity, clearly provided probable cause for defendant's arrest (see e.g. People v. Davis, 308 A.D.2d 343, 764 N.Y.S.2d 184 [2003], lv. denied 1 N.Y.3d 570, 775 N.Y.S.2d 787, 807 N.E.2d 900 [2003]; People v. Hutson, 270 A.D.2d 45, 704 N.Y.S.2d 50 [2000], lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 854, 714 N.Y.S.2d 5, 736 N.E.2d 866 [2000] ). Probable cause does not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt (see Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175, 69 S.Ct. 1302, 93 L.Ed. 1879 [1949]; People v. Bigelow, 66 N.Y.2d 417, 423, 497 N.Y.S.2d 630, 488 N.E.2d 451 [1985] ).
Defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved (People v. George, 67 N.Y.2d 817, 819, 501 N.Y.S.2d 639, 492 N.E.2d 767 [1986] ), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find no basis for reversal.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 01, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)