Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose RAFAEL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Donati, J.), rendered May 25, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 4 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea was properly denied. The allocution minutes demonstrate that defendant's plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, and that he understood the crime to which he was pleading guilty. Since defendant's motion to withdraw the plea was made on different grounds from those advanced on appeal, defendant has not preserved his present claim that his factual recitations negated an element of the crime, and we see no reason to invoke the limited exception to the preservation requirement set forth in People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5. Defendant's factual recitations, read as a whole and in context of the case (see, People v. McGowen, 42 N.Y.2d 905, 397 N.Y.S.2d 993, 366 N.E.2d 1347), do not cast significant doubt on his guilt (see, People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726, 631 N.Y.S.2d 119, 655 N.E.2d 160). Moreover, reduction of defendant's conviction to a lesser included offense, which is the only relief requested on appeal, would not be a lawful remedy (People v. Vaughn, 119 A.D.2d 779, 501 N.Y.S.2d 185, lv. denied 68 N.Y.2d 760, 506 N.Y.S.2d 1049, 497 N.E.2d 719). Defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 07, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)