Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JAMAICA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Respondents, La Interamericana Compania De Seguros Generales SA, et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered December 2, 1996, which granted the motion of defendant-respondent AIU Insurance Company to disqualify plaintiff's counsel, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court properly disqualified plaintiff's counsel for violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-108 (22 NYCRR 1200.27). Defendant-respondent established the existence of a prior attorney-client relationship with an attorney employed by that firm, which attorney was involved with issues relevant to the present litigation and who possessed confidences and secrets obtained as in-house counsel that are substantially related to issues in the present litigation, in particular the complex corporate structure of the holding company owning interests in respondent and certain other defendants and the interrelationship of such defendants (see, Solow v. W.R. Grace & Co., 83 N.Y.2d 303, 308, 610 N.Y.S.2d 128, 632 N.E.2d 437). Since the attorney had already revealed such knowledge in the early stages of the litigation, respondent met its burden of showing the reasonable probability that confidential information would be disclosed (see, Greene v. Greene, 47 N.Y.2d 447, 453, 418 N.Y.S.2d 379, 391 N.E.2d 1355). The dismissal of the action as against the moving party does not warrant vacatur or reversal of the order appealed from.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 06, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)