Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Steve A. LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), rendered June 17, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, and judgments, same court, (Roger Hayes, J.), both rendered November 19, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 31/212 to 7 years, to run concurrently with the sentences previously imposed, unanimously affirmed.
The court's instruction on accomplice liability, when viewed in its entirety, adequately conveyed to the jury that defendant could only be convicted as an accomplice if he intentionally aided the other participant and shared that person's specific intent in the commission of the crimes (see, People v. Brooks, 217 A.D.2d 492, 630 N.Y.S.2d 49, lv. denied 86 N.Y.2d 840, 634 N.Y.S.2d 449, 658 N.E.2d 227). The court's use of synonyms for statutory terms, employed for explanatory purposes in conjunction with the statutory terms themselves, was appropriate (see, People v. Tolia, 214 A.D.2d 57, 65, 631 N.Y.S.2d 632, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 1025, 651 N.Y.S.2d 24, 673 N.E.2d 1251), and the People's burden of proof was adequately covered elsewhere in the charge (see, People v. Fields, 87 N.Y.2d 821, 637 N.Y.S.2d 355, 660 N.E.2d 1134).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: January 12, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)