Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John M. HALL, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. 130-10 FOOD CORP., etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants. [And A Third-Party Action]
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered July 8, 1998, which denied defendants' Trade Fair Supermarkets and West Side Foods respective motions for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant summary judgment to defendant West Side dismissing the complaint as against it, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant West Side Poultry dismissing the complaint as against it.
We agree with the motion court that a question of fact remains regarding whether plaintiff, who tripped over a box while walking backwards and dragging empty milk cartons with a metal hook through Trade Fair's loading dock, should have seen and avoided the box in the exercise of reasonable care. Plaintiff's testimony indicates that he had previously cleared a path over which to drag the empty cartons, and had done so on nine occasions immediately prior to the accident without incident. Moreover, plaintiff asserted that the box was placed in his path by a negligent Trade Fair employee within a mere 10 or 15 seconds of his accident. Under these circumstances, it can not be said that plaintiff acted unreasonably as a matter of law in failing to observe this condition (compare, De Conno v. Golub Corp., 255 A.D.2d 734, 680 N.Y.S.2d 727, with De Rossi v. Golub Corp., 209 A.D.2d 911, 619 N.Y.S.2d 195). We find, however, that defendant West Side is entitled to summary judgment since there is no evidence demonstrating that it played any role in creating the condition that occasioned plaintiff's injuries, and since it had no duty to maintain Trade Fair's premises, and we modify accordingly.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 21, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)