Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jason SMITH, also known as Andre Smith, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered February 11, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of bail jumping in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed. Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eduardo Padro, J.), rendered December 4, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, criminal trespass in the second degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth and fifth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 3 1/212 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony. The investigatory lineup was not unduly suggestive (see People v. Chipp, 75 N.Y.2d 327, 336, 553 N.Y.S.2d 72, 552 N.E.2d 608 [1990], cert. denied 498 U.S. 833, 111 S.Ct. 99, 112 L.Ed.2d 70 [1990] ), and defendant's right to counsel had not attached (see People v. Mitchell, 2 N.Y.3d 272, 275, 778 N.Y.S.2d 427, 810 N.E.2d 879 [2004] ).
At each of defendant's trials, the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The record also establishes that defendant received effective assistance of counsel at each trial (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584 [1998]; see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 [1984] ).
At the trial resulting in defendant's convictions of burglary and related crimes, the court properly excused a juror as grossly unqualified, after she acknowledged that she had been sleeping and had missed some testimony (see People v. Valencia, 220 A.D.2d 274, 632 N.Y.S.2d 539 [1995], lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 855, 644 N.Y.S.2d 701, 667 N.E.2d 351 [1996] ).
With respect to both trials, defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 05, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)