Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Barbara CHISOLM, as Administratrix of the Estate of Lionel D. Chisolm, Deceased, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ST. VINCENT'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered July 30, 1998, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants' eve-of-trial oral motion to dismiss plaintiff's cause of action for wrongful death brought on behalf of the decedent's putative distributee, or, in the alternative, to preclude plaintiff from offering evidence establishing the status of the alleged distributee pursuant to EPTL 4-1.2, and adjourned the trial for 90 days for completion of disclosure on the issue of paternity, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Adjournment of the trial for completion of disclosure on the paternity issue was justified by an “unanticipated” circumstance (22 NYCRR 202.21 [d] ), namely, defendants' claimed need for such disclosure notwithstanding the prior order that had denied their prior eve-of-trial motion for summary judgment on the paternity issue upon “fairly strong” evidence of paternity, and sent the matter, including the paternity issue, for trial without any suggestion that there was to be further disclosure. Throughout the more than 12-year pendency of this action, defendants had never before demanded disclosure specifically pertaining to the paternity issue, which could have been resolved early on, and their responsibility for this delay is at least equal to plaintiff's. We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)