Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank PREKULI, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ira Globerman, J., at suppression hearing; Joseph Cerbone, J., at pleas and sentence), rendered January 16, 1997, convicting defendant of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. In contrast to identification procedures conducted after brief contacts, the experienced and trained undercover officer conducted an ongoing investigation into defendant's drug selling activities, including numerous conversations, and identified defendant at a showup three weeks after two major narcotics purchases involving over $6,000. This showup was confirmatory in nature and not subject to irreparable misidentification (see, People v. Gissendanner, 48 N.Y.2d 543, 552, 423 N.Y.S.2d 893, 399 N.E.2d 924). The identification of defendant's picture from a nonsuggestive photo array, 20 months later, by two other undercover officers involved in the same investigation was not rendered suggestive by the fact that the officer who called them to view the array may have mentioned defendant, by name, as the target of the investigation (see, People v. Hernandez, 70 N.Y.2d 833, 523 N.Y.S.2d 442, 517 N.E.2d 1328).
The court properly exercised its discretion by denying defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas, entered after the presentation of the People's direct case. Defendant's conclusory claims of innocence and inability to understand the English language were properly rejected after suitable inquiry, where the record, including defendant's use of English without any request for an interpreter, belied such claims (see, People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 410 N.Y.S.2d 555, 382 N.E.2d 1332).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 08, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)