Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The EAST NEW YORK SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SUN BEAM ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Defendants, Integra Realty, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered August 21, 1997, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 4403 to confirm a Special Referee's report, awarded plaintiff attorney's fees in the amount of $2,500 as “sanctions” to be imposed equally against defendant Integra Realty, Inc. (“Integra”) and its counsel, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Defendant Integra's initial motion to vacate the default judgment against it was properly denied (248 A.D.2d 245, 671 N.Y.S.2d 217) and its subsequent reargument motions, repetitive of the initial motion and/or each other, were patently meritless and, indeed, frivolous (see, Foley v. Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558, 567-568, 418 N.Y.S.2d 588) and, as such, proper grounds for the imposition of sanctions and/or costs, which we find appropriate in amount. Contrary to Integra's argument, the motion court's order adequately sets forth the objectionable conduct, the reason it was found to be frivolous, and an explanation of the sanctions imposed (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.2). While the order by its terms imposes “sanctions”, properly payable to the Lawyer's Fund for Client Protections under 22 NYCRR 130-1.3, it is clear that the award of “sanctions” was actually intended by the motion court as an award of costs to be utilized to cover the legal expenses incurred by plaintiff as a consequence of the vexatious litigation occasioned by defendant-appellant.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 08, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)